Tax rate and revaluation items in Orange County
The first 200 items. Each one links to the meeting it was on. This is the bottom of every drill-down on this site: whatever a chart says, the items behind it are here to be counted.
Search and filter
What these items are about
The subjects carried by every item this filter selects, not just the ones shown below. Each one narrows the list further.
Show these numbers as a table
| Subject | Items |
|---|---|
| Tax rate and revaluation | 652 |
| Housing and affordability | 54 |
| Budget and appropriations | 48 |
| Water and sewer | 25 |
| Contracts and procurement | 23 |
| Schools and education | 23 |
| Stormwater and flooding | 23 |
| Land conversion and large development | 20 |
| Farmland and open space | 18 |
| Bonds and debt | 17 |
| Health and human services | 16 |
| Fees and utility rates | 14 |
-
GAR Associates, hired in May 2026 after complaints about the 2025 revaluation, finds the values generally meet IAAO minimum statistical standards but cites several operational practices that do not. It recommends a true sales-comparison approach for homes, a new land valuation strategy, better data quality and sales q…Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
Staff outline pressures on the 2027-28 and 2028-29 budgets: falling net sales tax, a possible small tax increase for school debt, a property tax cap on the November ballot, state shifting of SNAP costs, and about $11 million a year at peak for $110 million in referendum bonds.Staff or committee report Bonds and debtBudget and appropriationsSchools and educationTax rate and revaluation
-
Chair DR Bryan reports on preliminary talks among some Orange County, Chapel Hill and Carrboro hoteliers about how the Visitors Bureau might be organized in future and about possible changes to local occupancy tax statutes. The agenda notes these are early ideas that neither the bureau's board nor the county has endor…
-
Routine motor vehicle property tax releases and refunds.Consent agenda Tax rate and revaluation
-
Routine property tax releases and refunds.Consent agenda Tax rate and revaluation
-
Late applications for property tax exemption or exclusion.Consent agenda Tax rate and revaluation
-
The follow-up actions list from the 25 August meeting, three tax collector's reports, the tax assessor's releases and refunds under $100, and a memorandum on the broadband project.
-
2.a Consent agendaSix reductions the county had already agreed with owners: Jeremy J. Taylor, Trustee ($1,061,100 to $931,200), Frederick L. Tapp ($877,000 to $779,000), Dakota Jeffery Fraser ($415,900 to $386,800), Hannah K. Adams ($341,700 to $320,900), Dietolf Ramm ($648,100 to $467,700) and Samuel Walker, Jr. ($204,600 to $148,700).Approved without changes, 3-0.Consent agenda Tax rate and revaluation
-
Ronald A. Zumstein appealed the $469,700 value on 101 Arbutus Place, citing condition and comparable properties, and argued for $325,000. The board accepted the county's recommended reduction. The appellant did not appear.Value set at $437,700, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Eloise Wade Williams appealed the $224,700 value on 519 Alpha Drive, citing condition, and argued for $190,000. The board accepted the county's recommended reduction.Value set at $217,500, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Albert S. Williams appealed the $456,100 value on 5515 Old Greensboro Road, citing comparable properties, condition and incorrect data, and argued for $300,000. The board went below the county's recommendation, adding 10% building depreciation for deferred maintenance.Value set at $403,400, 2-1.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Barbara A. Crumpler appealed the $309,500 value on 1631 Providence Glen Drive, citing comparable properties, and argued for $220,000. The board accepted the county's recommendation of no change.Value set at $309,500, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Anita Disney appealed the $751,200 value on 412 Lyons Road, citing incorrect data and condition, and argued for $672,800. The board accepted the county's recommended reduction. The appellant did not appear.Value set at $748,500, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Laura Jost Malahias appealed the $1,708,600 value on 103 Founders Ridge Drive, citing a recent third-party appraisal and comparable properties, and argued for $1,401,000. The board set the value at the fee appraisal, overriding the county's recommendation.Value set at $1,401,000, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Noah Ojunugwa Agada appealed the $1,436,800 value on 3320 Tree Farm Road, citing condition and comparable properties, and argued for $1,000,000. The board continued the appeal so the county can review comparable properties the appellant submitted.Continued, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Gerald E. Gentry appealed the $146,100 value on 4515 Kimbro Road, citing comparable properties and non-uniform valuation, and argued for $60,000. The board accepted the county's recommended reduction. The appellant did not appear.Value set at $135,100, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Gerald E. Gentry appealed the $64,900 value on 8722 Orange Grove Road, citing condition, citing the 100-year flood plain, and argued for $30,000. The board accepted the county's recommended reduction. The appellant did not appear.Value set at $31,500, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Gerald Gentry appealed the $73,700 value on 4516 Kimbro Road, citing comparable properties and unequal rural land valuation, and argued for $45,000. The board accepted the county's recommendation of no change. The appellant did not appear.Value set at $73,700, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Pamela S. Taren appealed the $260,300 value on 184 St. Andrews Lane, citing comparable properties and condition, and argued for $167,581. The board went below the county's recommendation, cutting land value 10% for topography and applying 30% building depreciation.Value set at $205,200, 2-1.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Derek Grotheer appealed the $720,200 value on 1224 Clandon Square Road, citing comparable properties and inequitable assessment, and argued for $647,700. The board accepted the county's recommended reduction.Value set at $702,200, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Pearl C. Cole appealed the $266,000 value on 611 Pine Acres Road, citing condition, and argued for $150,000. Presented by the owner's daughter. The board rated the building poor as vacant and unlivable, with 60% physical depreciation, setting a value below the appellant's own figure.Value set at $112,100, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Pharaohs Rentals LLC appealed the $933,700 value on 414 Hillsborough Street, citing condition, comparable properties and income and expense data, and argued for $750,000. The board overrode the county's value on comparable properties. The appellant did not appear.Value set at $875,000, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Jonathan Daniel Linke appealed the $878,200 value on 104 Manchester Place, citing incorrect data, and argued for $856,400. The board accepted the county's recommended change, which matched the appellant's figure. The appellant did not appear.Value set at $856,400, 3-0.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
The tax collector's annual settlement, the formal close-out of the year's collections.
-
Three tax collector's reports, including in-rem foreclosure progress, and the tax assessor's releases and refunds under $100.Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
CCP Chapel Hill 0806 LP contests the county's $10,020,600 value on its property at 1602 E. Franklin Street, arguing for $5,600,000 from a weighted blend of the equity approach at 10 percent, the cost approach at 60 percent and sales comparison at 30 percent. The owner's representative appeared by video.Continued to September 24, 3-0Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Paliouras Enterprises LLC contests the $2,382,000 value on 157 E. Rosemary Street, arguing for $966,400 from a three-year income and expense history and a market proforma. Nobody appeared for the owner.Value set at $2,373,000, 3-0Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Paliouras Enterprises LLC contests the $841,700 value on 1404 E. Franklin Street, arguing for $577,951 from a three-year income and expense history with average net operating income capitalized at 12.41 percent. Nobody appeared for the owner.No change, value held at $841,700, 3-0Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
2.d Value Appeal - Elliot Chapel Hill Borrower LLC, PIN 9799278842, 232 Butler Ct - 501 Midtown AptsElliot Chapel Hill Borrower LLC contests the $40,394,200 value on the 501 Midtown apartments at 232 Butler Court, arguing for $35,000,000 on condition and maintenance grounds: Tropical Storm Chantal damaged the property in July 2025, raising vacancy and cutting rental income. Nobody appeared for the owner.No change, value held at $40,394,200, 3-0
-
Whether an appellant had standing to challenge assessments on properties they do not own. Eleven were brought on a claim of being aggrieved by other owners' valuations; four more on signed authorization and power of attorney forms. The county attorney presented evidence and case law from the UNC School of Government.Standing denied on all 15 properties; 3-0 on both motions
-
A value appeal on condition and maintenance grounds. The county's figure was $613,000 and the owner argued for $400,000. The board accepted the county's revised value.Value set at $544,200, 3-0Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
A value appeal on a property flooded during tropical storm Chantal in 2025. The county recommended no change and the owner's own figure matched it.No change; value stands at $52,000, 3-0
-
A business asked the board to waive a late listing penalty of $193.03, saying the failure to file was an isolated oversight.Waived in full, 3-0
-
A penalty of $12.32, where the filer's accountant chose the print option rather than filing electronically.Waived in full, 3-0
-
A penalty of $12.62 attributed to an internal oversight by the filer's accountant. The board declined to waive it, the only split vote of the meeting.Compromise denied; penalty stands at $12.62, 2-1
-
Six commercial appeals, all with the owner not attending, all before the same appraiser. One limited partnership appeals 58 individual townhouse properties as a block. A self-storage company appeals four sites, three on Ashley Wade Lane and one on Booth Road. A student housing entity appeals a property on Martin Luthe…Reduced to $25,816,400, or $457,400 per unit, 3-0
-
An appeal from comparable properties on a $14,500,000 assessment. The owner argued for $9,000,000.No change, value held at $14,500,000, 3-0
-
One of four self-storage parcels appealed together on recent income and expense data, with the owner arguing the four should be valued collectively at $5.3 million. This parcel was assessed at $600,900.Reduced to $494,700, 3-0Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
The second of the four self-storage parcels, assessed at $1,137,900.Reduced to $979,000, 3-0Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
The third of the four self-storage parcels, assessed at $490,900.No change, value held at $490,900, 3-0Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
The largest of the four self-storage parcels, assessed at $5,210,500.Reduced to $4,136,800, 3-0Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Six residential appeals against 2026 valuations, four with the owner attending and scheduled in the first forty-five minutes, two later in the afternoon without. Properties are spread across the county and four different appraisers are assigned.No change, value held at $503,664, 3-0Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Requires a motion.Reduced to $705,800, 3-0Consent agenda Tax rate and revaluation
-
An appeal from comparable sales on a $631,800 assessment, with the owner arguing for $536,600. The board went further than the county recommended, setting the effective year built to match the actual year built.Reduced to $619,500, 3-0Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
An appeal arguing a property in a flood zone should be assessed at $140,000 rather than $162,100.No change, value held at $162,100, 3-0
-
An appeal on a $123,200 lot, arguing that its position near a railroad and surrounded by Town of Chapel Hill land is a negative influence, and that a neighbor's driveway encroaches on it. The owner asked for $95,000.Reduced to $114,000, 3-0Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
The board removed one parcel from the consent agenda. It wanted the county's reasoning but would not go into the specifics of the appeal while the appellant had no chance to be there, so it rescheduled the case as a full hearing. The rest of the consent agenda was then approved.Consent agenda approved as amended, 3-0; the removed appeal rescheduled for a full hearing, 3-0Consent agenda Tax rate and revaluation
-
Public comment.One resident spoke, on a property tax error she said had run since 1969 on a half-acre and since 1952 on a further acre. She argued the five-year limit on back-collection removes any incentive to cor…
-
Changes to the Longtime Homeowner Assistance program, which discounts or rebates property tax for low-income owners. Now in its fifth year.Approved unanimously: eligibility widened to ten years of ownership, with a new component for owners aged 70 or over at 30% of area median income or below who have been in their home twenty years. St…
-
Who supervises the county tax administrator. Staff laid out five models, from the board taking full day-to-day oversight to leaving it entirely with the county manager. One commissioner argued against board supervision, saying he had seen department heads forced out over clashes with commissioners and expected politic…Approved unanimously on a Pitt County model: the annual evaluation is the board's with the manager's input, the work plan is the manager's with the board's input, and day-to-day supervision stays wit…
-
Appointment to the Board of Health. An optometrist seat, vacant since January 2026, stays open.Approved unanimously.
-
Eight appeals of 2026 real property valuations, most on condition or maintenance, two on a recent third-party appraisal and one on a recent purchase. Five appellants appeared; three did not.All decided 3-0: three no change, four reduced, one raised above the county's own figure.
-
A consent agenda of settled appeals, with the four Prime Storage parcels pulled out of it.Prime Storage removed from consent so Analytical Consultants could appear and explain the county's valuation process.
-
Dates for hearings after the board formally adjourns, which state law allows for appeals noticed close to adjournment.Approved 3-0 for 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13 and 26 August.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
Staff reviews of two valuation neighborhoods the board had ordered.No change recommended to either. Information items, no vote.
-
Eight appeals of 2026 valuations, on condition, incorrect data, a recent third-party appraisal, comparable properties, and in one case nearby trailer parks. Two appellants appeared in person and one remotely.All decided 3-0. Every decision landed between the county's value and the owner's, except one that produced no change.
-
Appeals settled without a hearing.Carried 3-0.Minutes approval Tax rate and revaluation
-
Staff recommendations for valuation neighborhoods, presented by two appraisers.Reviewed.Public hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
The county tax administrator and a colleague report on what the tax office has changed in how it assesses property.Procedural Tax rate and revaluation
-
What the work group does next.Minutes approval Tax rate and revaluation
-
The fiscal 2027 operating budget, the county fee schedule, an opioid settlement fund spending authorization the state requires, and a resolution defining how occupancy tax is used. Built from decisions the board reached at a 4 June work session after a January retreat where the manager described an unprecedented $21 m…A motion to send the budget back to the manager for another 0.47 cents in cuts failed 3-3. The budget then passed 5-1, McKee opposed, saying he feared the beginning of a long line of tax increases.
-
Final design and guaranteed maximum price for the Crisis Diversion Facility, an amendment to the Gilbane construction manager-at-risk contract, and the budget amendment raising capital authority to match.Approved unanimously. The financing resolution for it, up to $27 million, followed on 9 July.
-
Twelve appeals of 2026 real property valuations.All decided 3-0. Nine values reduced, one left unchanged, with condition ratings and a land adjustment altered in two of them.
-
How much of a tax increase to levy for schools. Three increases were on the table.0.81 cents failed 3-4; 0.47 cents passed 4-3.
-
The county fee schedule for the coming year.Not reached.
-
The resolution setting out what the board would adopt on 16 June: an ad valorem rate of 68.05 cents per $100, a Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools district tax of 14.79 cents, and fire district rates.Approved 6-1, McKee opposed.
-
A three-year rewrite of the county's 2009 farmland preservation plan, timed so it can feed into the Land Use Plan 2050 update.Accepted unanimously. The agricultural preservation board was still working through a web version of it in July.
-
The 1979 agreement under which the county tax collector bills and collects for Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough. Updated in 2006 at 0.5 percent of what it collects, with a term not to exceed 99 years and no change possible without all three towns agreeing.The board voted unanimously to terminate the agreement before 30 June 2026 and renegotiate with each town separately. One commissioner said there should be no more 99-year agreements.
-
Minutes, motor vehicle and property tax releases and refunds, and other routine items.Approved unanimously.
-
The county manager presented the recommended FY 2026-27 budget, organized around five priorities: minimizing the tax rate increase, prioritizing public safety and social safety net direct services, maximizing efficiencies and cost recovery while preserving core services, and modest investment in employee compensation.
-
The formal hearing on the recommended budget, opened and closed by motion.
-
Twelve property value appeals plus a consent agenda. Most were argued on condition and maintenance; one on incorrect data. Six assessments were reduced, two were raised, and four held unchanged. The largest cut took a property from $340,400 to $255,300.All decided 3-0Procedural Tax rate and revaluation
-
Forty-five minutes on the twelve fire and fire service district rates.
-
A discussion with GAR Associates, an appraisal and assessment consulting firm.
-
Consultants set out a review built on four principles - comprehensive, statistically rigorous, focused on vertical inequity, and operational - with a formal report due September 2026. Work group members raised overvaluation of lower-income properties against undervaluation of higher-income ones, how lower-income owner…
-
An executive search firm gathering what the next tax administrator will face, for the recruitment brochure, interview questions and a finalist skills assessment. The group named rebuilding trust after the revaluation, consistency and accountability in the office, readiness for scrutiny at the next cycle, workload from…
-
Built on five priorities: minimising the tax rate increase, prioritising public safety and the social safety net, maximising efficiencies in county operations, and modest investment in employee compensation.
-
Financing contracts for up to about $60.8 million for the year's capital projects and equipment, with a resolution supporting the county's application to the state Local Government Commission. Staff recommended splitting the package in two, closing in June and in late July or early August, with financing and transacti…
-
Consultants engaged to evaluate the county's reappraisal and assessment process and recommend improvements, following community feedback and board concerns about deficiencies after the 2025 revaluation. The tax assessment work group that recommended the firm includes three commissioners and county officers alongside r…
-
A contract with GAR Associates to evaluate how Orange County conducts reappraisal and tax assessment. The firm met with the county's tax assessment work group on May 18, alongside the recruiter searching for a permanent tax administrator.
-
Nine sitting dates adopted: 26 and 27 May, 9, 10, 11, 23, 24 and 25 June, adjourning 30 June.Procedural Tax rate and revaluation
-
Eight questions of procedure: guidelines for good cause in accepting untimely appeals; hour blocks against fifteen-minute appointments; displaying evidence in the board room; requiring evidence to be submitted by a date; qualified representatives of property-owning entities; use of non-attorney consultants; calling wi…Consent agenda accepted
-
Staff authorised to produce an analysis of two neighbourhoods and bring it back to the board.Discussion item Tax rate and revaluation
-
Whether to change current practice, under which nearly all untimely appeals are accepted, weighed against the need for equitable judgment. The staff attorney was asked to prepare a document setting out where good cause applies.Staff attorney to draft guidance for the May meetingProcedural Tax rate and revaluation
-
Hour-long blocks against fifteen-minute appointments. Appraisers will keep the schedule full by booking appeals into the earliest available slot, and appellants will be told their hearing goes ahead as scheduled unless they ask the tax office to move it.Discussion item Tax rate and revaluation
-
A project to mount an evidence display monitor and reconfigure the hearing room, still in approvals. Members discussed whether the county's evidence should go to appellants in advance and decided it will be shown during the hearing and provided afterward on request.Discussion item Tax rate and revaluation
-
A one-year moratorium on large-scale data centres as a land use, explicitly covering artificial intelligence data centres, cryptocurrency mining facilities, data processing facilities and similar uses. Directed on 5 March, presented on 17 March, and heard here, with staff simultaneously drafting ordinance amendments t…Approved unanimously
-
Staff proposed raising the Longtime Homeowner Assistance Program's eligibility threshold from five years of ownership to ten, which would have cut 2025 recipients from 806 to 669 households while freeing about $62,000 for longer-tenured owners. Commissioners also weighed a "hold harmless" option, raised by Commissione…
-
Interim Tax Administrator John Burgiss presented Tanner Valuation's review of 173 neighborhoods with weak sales data, which cut assessed values on 2,763 properties by $98.8 million. With appeals included, the tax base fell $458.6 million, 1.47%.Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
The work group's contract with GAR Associates for a full review of the assessment process remains under legal review, with approval expected April 21 or May 5.
-
Commissioner Marilyn Carter said a House committee may send voters a constitutional amendment limiting county tax levy increases, while the Senate is weighing separate rate limits privately.
-
The group set a Doodle poll for its next meeting, expected in mid-to-late May, when GAR Associates would take part.Discussion item Tax rate and revaluation
-
The board approved most of a 17-item consent agenda in one vote, including tax releases, proclamations, a server-licensing contract, solar-project funding and a shelter-contract renewal. It pulled a $1.7 million loan for an Orange Grove Fire District fire station after a resident raised transparency concerns, and vote…
-
The county's 2026 priority legislative issues, matched to the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners' 2025-26 advocacy goals and the county's FY 2025-29 strategic plan. Farmland preservation is a top-six goal. Others include protecting clean water supplies and watersheds, state funding for disaster mitigat…
-
A review of the charge the county commissioners gave the work group in September 2025, and of the group's ground rules.Procedural Tax rate and revaluation
-
Members praised GAR Associates for a clearer technical approach, stronger command of North Carolina tax law and a more polished presentation than Landin and Associates. Landin's pitch included a public dashboard and an equity focus, but members called it less detailed and less aligned with the county's needs.
-
The group recommended GAR Associates to the Board of Commissioners, citing staff scores of 88.14 to 82.25 for Landin and work group scores of 87.8 to 70.5. The Board of Commissioners approved a contract with GAR Associates on May 5.
-
The group set April 7 or April 21 as target dates for the Board of Commissioners to approve the consultant contract. The next meeting, April 13, covers the Tanner Valuation Report, contract negotiation status and state property tax reform.Discussion item Tax rate and revaluation
-
Appointing the tax administrator to hold the acting tax collector and acting tax assessor roles as well.
-
Tax staff adjusted values in 57 of 172 reviewed neighborhoods, cutting $98.8 million, after a countywide equity review of the 2025 revaluation. Appeals added $359.9 million more, for a total reduction of $458.7 million, 1.47% of the tax base.Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
Commissioners expanded the county's top legislative priorities from five to six, adding public education alongside farmland preservation, housing, behavioral health, detention facilities and fiscal stability. The full amended list of 21 priorities goes to Orange County's legislative delegation at a March 23 breakfast.
-
The consent agenda approved a $97,075 geotechnical contract for the Lake Orange intake tower and a reallocation of proceeds from the county's 2019 bonds. It also released tax value on four vehicle bills and nine property tax bills for eight owners.
-
Paul Snow of Analytical Consultants presented on the county's commercial assessment, arguing from the assessment ratio that baseline figures showed a need for significant correction, that the correction came partly through an aggressive but accurate commercial assessment, that appeal reductions came in below predictio…
-
Clinton Swaringen, tax administrator for Stanly County, described why his county moved all revaluation work in house in 2005 after contracted revaluations from 1993 to 2001 were judged unsuccessful. He said face-to-face appeals with familiar staff build trust and reduce conflict, and that early outreach to commercial…
-
The group set its next meeting, March 9, to review a request for proposals.
-
Results of the 2025 Longtime Homeowner Assistance programme, which gives low-income county homeowners a discount or rebate on their property tax bill. Staff ran a five-month campaign to raise applications above 2024: a programme flyer with the August tax bills, work with the Jackson Center, Homeowners United and Justi…
-
Fifteen real property value appeals, mostly commercial, with every appellant appearing. Appellants included retail property companies, student housing partnerships, a university real estate holding company, and a warehouse owner. Six assessments were reduced, seven held and two increased. In the opening case the appel…Six reduced, seven unchanged, two increased
-
Tax leadership presented an overview of the board-ordered neighborhood review project, at the board's request from a prior meeting. Reviews of individual neighborhoods came back to the board through the spring.Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
Research findings from the community, presented by the work group's representative from the NC Housing Coalition.
-
A report from the chair of the board of equalization and review, which hears property tax appeals.Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
Next steps for the group's assessment improvement work. It went on to hear commercial and in-house appraisal presentations on March 2 and to recommend a vendor on March 19.Discussion item Tax rate and revaluation
-
Eleven property value appeals, mostly residential, with assessments ranging from $68,000 to $2.16 million. Seven values were reduced and four held, none increased. The largest proportional reduction took a property from $80,000 to $68,000.Seven reduced, four unchanged, none increasedOther Tax rate and revaluation
-
Commissioners authorized talks toward separate tax-collection agreements with Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough, replacing the towns' shared 1979 agreement. Staff say the county's 0.5% collection fee no longer covers its costs. The board also authorized similar talks with Durham and Mebane, whose agreements expir…
-
Eighteen property value appeals, with assessments running from $173,100 to $103.3 million. Eight values were reduced, eight held and two increased.Eight reduced, eight unchanged, two increasedOther Tax rate and revaluation
-
The board heard seven residential tax appeals from the 2026 revaluation. Grounds included storm damage, floodplain and land-use limits, comparable sales, and needed repairs. Four assessments were reduced and three were left unchanged; the board raised none. Five owners appeared in person, one sent a family member, and…Four reduced, three unchanged, none increased
-
SZ Chapel Hill Apartments LP asked the board to consider this vacant 5.48-acre parcel, part of the Chapel Ridge student housing complex, together with two other parcels, seeking to cut their combined value from $43,247,500 to $36,155,500 while leaving this parcel's own $2,291,600 allocation unchanged. The county agree…Four reduced, twelve unchanged, none increased
-
II (9:00 a.m.) Morning appeals hearings — commercialPS NC III LP sought to lower this storage property's $14,465,700 value based on actual income and a market proforma. The county's commercial appraiser analysis found the value supported by comparable sales and income. The board sustained it.Thirteen unchanged, two reduced, one increasedPublic hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
A progress report with questions on the present-use value audit, presented by the county's present-use value compliance review appraiser. The programme taxes qualifying farmland on its agricultural use rather than market value, and the audit checks continued eligibility.
-
II (1:00 p.m.) Afternoon appeals hearings — residentialThe owner sought to lower this Mebane storage property's $8,645,700 value based on actual income and a market proforma. The county's analysis found the value supported by comparable sales and income. The board sustained it.Eight reduced; one untimely appeal deniedPublic hearing Tax rate and revaluation
-
III Consent AgendaThe owner of this 87,730-square-foot Mebane warehouse sought a reduction from $5,428,500 to $5,000,000, citing a 2022 sale price of $4,950,000 and a market proforma. The county said the sale involved below-market legacy leases and limited site access, and after accounting for that recommended $5,265,700. The board acc…
-
IV.a Finance ReportThe bureau was 69 percent expended as of December, with $1.08 million or 84 percent of the sales and marketing budget spent and the arts commission at $383,000. Thirty thousand dollars was appropriated from fund balance, which remains at 8 percent. Occupancy tax revenues are projected flat, attributed to federal trave…
-
II (9:00 a.m.) Morning appeals hearingsThe board heard 11 morning appeals. Seven owners attended or were represented; four were decided without them. Grounds included disputed comparables, property condition and square-footage counts. The board reduced all 11 assessments, cutting their combined value from $5,192,700 to $4,432,500, a $760,200 drop. Individu…All reduced
-
II (1:00 p.m.) Afternoon appeals hearingsThe board heard six afternoon appeals; all six owners attended, one of them remotely. Grounds ranged from flooding and steep terrain on vacant land to a comparable-sale dispute and a broker's valuation estimate. The board reduced five assessments and left one unchanged. Combined value fell from $1,157,700 to $988,800,…
-
Thirteen items approved together: five sets of minutes; motor vehicle and property tax releases for eighteen taxpayers; sixteen late exemption applications; a March 25 tax lien advertisement date; the 2026 listing period extended to February 13; budget amendment #6; ordinance execution for the impervious surface, wate…Approved unanimously
-
A report on a state legislative committee hearing on property taxes, where members discussed limiting annual property tax increases to 2 or 3 percent and reviewing how counties conduct revaluations.
-
Tax collector reports including in-rem foreclosure progress, the tax assessor's report on releases under $100, a memorandum on pending unified development ordinance amendments, an update on the school food share pilot project, and recognition of employee retirements from October through December 2025.
-
The January operating model shows a $21.5 million gap for FY 2026-27, rising to $37.6 million and $53.6 million in the two years after. One cent on the tax rate is worth about $3.37 million against a $33.9 billion base, so the gap is about seven cents. Revenue assumptions include 2 percent natural growth worth $4.3 mi…
-
The board heard 18 property tax appeals from the 2025 revaluation, reducing 11 assessments and leaving seven unchanged. The largest cut went to Abriata Group LLC, whose two 1938 and 1939 houses on McCauley Street dropped from $894,600 to $501,900, below even the county's own $786,700 recommendation, after inspectors f…Eleven reduced, seven unchanged
-
Twenty-two appeals, mostly commercial and multifamily property in Chapel Hill and Hillsborough. Three assessments were raised on the county's recommendation, two were reduced and seventeen held. Ten of the unchanged appeals were one owner's parcels on Regent Place and Weaver Dairy Road.Three increased, two reduced, seventeen unchanged
-
Twenty-one appeals were heard: seven from individual homeowners in the morning, 14 from companies owning apartment complexes and commercial buildings in the afternoon. The board reduced seven assessments, held ten unchanged, increased one, continued two and denied one as untimely. The docket was dominated by large Cha…Seven reduced, ten unchanged, one increased, two continued, one denied as untimely
-
Free tax preparation appointments opened January 12, with the service running February 1 through April 15.
-
A briefing from the county attorney's office on the statutes governing the board of equalization and review, the state Department of Revenue appeals manual, and county practice. The duty to review tax lists is separate from the appeals process; grounds for appeal are properties appraised substantially above market val…
-
The request for proposals went out in early January and a pre-submittal conference drew four vendors. Proposals were due January 23, with review possibly requiring an extra meeting in March.
-
Neighborhood research findings from the NC Housing Coalition representative, deferred for lack of time.Deferred to February 9
-
February 9 will carry the deferred research presentation and, with public notice, possibly a session with sitting members of the board of equalization and review. Also queued: a dashboard showing neighborhood changes, a consultant's evaluation report, county commissioner reports the group can also see, and a range of…Discussion item Tax rate and revaluation
-
Two of three business personal-property listing-penalty requests were granted. Morgan Creek Capital Management LLC, in Chapel Hill, had $1,116.96 waived for a late 2025 listing, and Tarheel Town Pharmacy, in Carrboro, had $86.80 waived for listings missed from 2020 through 2024. The board denied a $1,071.10 compromise…Penalties compromisedOther Tax rate and revaluation
-
II (4-23) Appeals HearingsTwenty-three value appeals, just over half of them commercial property, in Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Hillsborough, Mebane and Efland. Seventeen assessments were reduced, five held and one raised as part of a reallocation between two parcels operating as one fitness center. The deepest single cut was $6,809,600, on 6801 I…Seventeen reduced, five unchanged, one increased
-
The board decided 27 of the 28 scheduled appeals, reducing 20 assessments by a combined $6,189,700 and leaving 7 unchanged; none went up. The largest cut, $1,860,700, went to Chapel Hill Timberlyne LLC's office building at 1129 Weaver Dairy Road, down to $15,053,600.Twenty reduced, seven unchanged
-
Twenty-five appeals, mostly houses and unimproved parcels in Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Hillsborough, assessed between $176,100 and $4,333,000. Sixteen were reduced and nine held.Sixteen reduced, nine unchanged
-
Twenty owners appealed 2025 property revaluations, with assessed values in dispute from $132,500 to $1,865,300. Grounds included square footage, comparable sales, property condition and a denied building permit; Keyway LLC separately argued its townhouse valuation reflected a since-cooled market peak. The ten reductio…Ten reduced, ten unchanged
-
II (9:00 a.m.) Morning appeals hearingsFifteen appeals on houses in Chapel Hill's Northside district and Carrboro's Lloyd/Broad district, arguing land overvaluation, condition deficiencies and equity problems within the neighborhood. All fifteen were reduced, from 2.2 percent to 38.2 percent.All reduced
-
II (1:00 p.m.) Afternoon appeals hearingsTwenty more appeals in the same neighborhoods, on Knolls Street, Grant Street, Crest Drive, Eugene Street, Guthrie Avenue, Alabama Avenue, Glosson Circle, Bert Street, Rencher Street, James Street and Johnson Street. All twenty were reduced, from 5.4 percent to 62.8 percent, after staff review and site inspections.All reduced
-
Commissioners reported on a new North Carolina House special committee on property taxes meeting December 17, warned by the state association that Florida and California moves to cap or eliminate property taxes may influence the conversation here. They also updated the board on the tax assessment work group, which has…
-
The board rescinded a December 3 consent-agenda decision on one property and revised its value to $460,900, then heard 16 appeals of 2025 revaluation values from 14 individual owners and one company, Evans Estates REI LLC. It reduced 14 values, sustained one, and raised one after a site visit found undocumented improv…Fourteen reduced, one unchanged, one increased
-
The program discounts or rebates county property tax for low-income long-term homeowners. Applications rose from 604 in 2024 to 942 in 2025 and approvals from 502 to an estimated 850, following the revaluation. The estimated county tax burden across recipients is $1,894,000; the current $377,805 allocation would cover…Approved unanimously to reach 25 percent, with staff to propose how
-
Through November 26, appeals had cut $232,489,448 from assessed value, with a median reduction of $38,000 on residential and $66,400 on non-residential property. There were 3,346 informal appeals and 1,109 formal ones across 3,966 unique properties; 77 formal appeals missed the deadline. All informal appeals were deci…Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
Eight items: two sets of minutes; motor vehicle and property tax releases; four electric conversion vans for accessible transportation for people who cannot use fixed-route buses; health department personal health services fee changes; budget amendment #5; a transit scheduling and dispatch software agreement with budg…Approved unanimously
-
Questions submitted by community members on the work group. Topics included how vacancy rates affect commercial valuations, whether elevation per square foot is used in valuation, the two-step appeal process and its lack of cost, how the county physically appraises property, what data owners can access when preparing…
-
The draft RFP for a consultant to review the reappraisal, covering purpose, schedule, criteria and scope. Members asked why known problems are not named in the document and pressed for a brief that fixes issues rather than only verifying earlier findings; the manager said the consultant will build on the previous cons…
-
Neighbourhood reviews were expected the following week, with summary documentation to follow and full recommendations possibly taking longer. The consultant carrying out the reviews offered suggestions even though formal recommendations were not requested.Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
Members suggested meeting on the third of each month and moving from in-person to virtual meetings for better participation. The next meeting was set for January 12.Discussion item Tax rate and revaluation
-
The board heard six appeals from one property owner on vacant, non-perking lots the owner said could not be built on without sewer access. Current values on the six ran from $31,800 to $66,300; the appellant asked for $15,000 on each. The board left two lots unchanged and cut the other four to $39,800, adopting none o…Four reduced, two unchanged
-
III Consent AgendaThe board approved by consent fifteen more parcels recommended for a value change, for reasons including a GIS-documented easement, floodplain and watershed restrictions, corrected building records, and one owner-submitted fee appraisal. Current values on these parcels ran from $184,900 to about $2.36 million; the app…
-
Twenty-three commercial appeals covering apartment complexes, hotels and offices in Chapel Hill, contesting 2025 valuations as high as $41,298,300. The board reduced fourteen and left nine unchanged, cutting combined value from $327,667,600 to $299,042,500. Owners argued income approaches from their own financial stat…Fourteen reduced, eight unchanged, one increased
-
Wake County's tax administrator and a colleague presented on how that county administers property assessment. The presentation was attached to the summary for members' review.
-
A preview of the December 5 meeting covers an appeals and neighborhood review update and a draft RFP to evaluate the county's reappraisal process. Members were asked to review the UNC School of Government and Department of Revenue presentations from November 14 and submit questions in advance.
-
Eight items: motor vehicle and property tax releases for thirty-nine taxpayers across forty-seven bills; twelve untimely exemption applications; denial of one refund request; a five-year renewal of the Fairview Park interlocal agreement with Hillsborough; a resolution letting Alamance County take ownership of a parcel…Approved unanimously
-
The board heard 29 real-property appeals of 2025 revaluation values over a morning and an afternoon session, reducing 20 assessments, leaving eight unchanged, and raising one after finding a misclassified garage. Eight of the appeals, from one trust and from Mastin Holdings LLC and CHNS LLC, involved Northside Chapel…Twenty reduced, eight unchanged, one increased
-
The board heard appeals from 16 property owners contesting their 2025 assessments, plus a business asking to reduce personal-property tax penalties. Owners or their representatives appeared in person for five of the sixteen valuation appeals; the business appeared remotely, and the rest were decided on written submiss…Ten reduced, four unchanged, one increased
-
The Savannah Bananas play Kenan Stadium April 11 and 12, with an $80,000 bid fee from occupancy tax revenue plus $7,200 from Carrboro. The fee consumed most of the promotions budget, so $30,000 came from reserves for marketing, and the budget office advised against further draws. Occupancy tax revenue was about $2.196…
-
The board heard 13 real-property valuation appeals, with eight owners appearing in person and five submitting evidence in writing. It reduced nine assessments and left four unchanged, cutting combined value from $11,956,600 to $10,520,200, a drop of about 12%. Individual reductions ranged from 4% to 50% of assessed va…Nine reduced, four unchanged
-
Kirk Boone of the UNC School of Government and Doug Huffman of the North Carolina Department of Revenue present on how reappraisal works in North Carolina.
-
A consultant from Tanner Valuation Group, reviewing the county's assessment neighborhoods, shared trends, analysis and initial lessons. He said vertical inequity is easy to identify but much harder to correct, and that the properties flagged from among thousands were ones not maintained or updated, which had been trea…Staff or committee report Tax rate and revaluation
-
The work group discussed inviting a representative from Wake County to describe that county's experience in a 90-minute virtual session, to be recorded for members who can't attend live, on either November 20 or 21. Members also discussed availability for January meetings.
-
The board heard 17 of 18 scheduled valuation appeals of the county's 2025 revaluation, citing comparable sales, land value and measurement corrections. Two owners took part remotely and eight did not appear. It reduced twelve appeals, by amounts from $1,300 to about $228,700. Five appeals stayed unchanged, including t…Twelve reduced, five unchanged
-
Preliminary unaudited FY25 results. Sales tax came in low, including one month posting negative because of refunds, and the district is checking with the state Department of Revenue and the DMV. Interest earnings above $1 million at nearly 5 percent brought total revenue to $13.6 million despite a $400,000 drop in Art…
-
The county's property tax relief program drew 949 applications, a significant increase staff attributed to the revaluation. New repair and rehabilitation funds are available for older residents, and cold weather night shelters have opened with one night used so far.
-
The board heard 16 property-tax appeals of assessments set in the county's revaluation effective Jan. 1, 2025, all but one from individual homeowners; the exception, Gronks Doghouse LLC, contested the assessment on its 705 Coker Lane parcel. It reduced ten values and left six unchanged, cutting a combined $852,800, wi…Ten reduced, six unchanged
-
JGW Investments LLC sought a reduction in the $3,961,700 assessed value of its 41,341-square-foot building at 110 Rebecca Drive. The board dismissed the appeal because the company's tax agent did not submit a Power of Attorney.DismissedOther Tax rate and revaluation
-
Items included minutes from October 7 and October 14, motor vehicle and property tax releases for nineteen taxpayers, nineteen untimely exemption applications, a resolution updating compensation for members of the board of equalization and review following a statewide survey of what other counties pay, and the purchas…Approved unanimously
-
Westdale Poplar Place LP appeals the $27.29 million assessed value of its 230-unit complex at 605 Jones Ferry Road, seeking $26.41 million on an income approach; the county's appraisal consultant recommends no change. A second appellant asks the board to accept a personal property appeal on a utility trailer filed two…One reduced; one untimely appeal denied
-
One owner appeals three parcels on West Lakeview Drive, citing zoning concerns. Two are assessed at $150,000 with a requested value of $100,000 each; the third, an unimproved 0.17-acre lot, is assessed at $100.One reduced, two unchangedOther Tax rate and revaluation
-
County Manager Travis Myren presented background on the property revaluation and appeals process, and Co-Chair Amy Fowler read the work group's charge. Myren also described an in-progress request for proposal for a consultant to review the county's assessment process, with recommendations the group could bring to the…Presentation Tax rate and revaluation
-
Beverly Walton contests the county's $255,500 value on 119 Rencher Street, arguing for a reduction on condition and comparable sales. The county's own opinion was $136,000.Reduced to $136,000, the county's recommended valueOther Tax rate and revaluation
-
Alfred Udah contests the county's $435,300 value on 4114 Linden Road, arguing for a reduction on comparable property. The county's own opinion was $435,300.No change, $435,300Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Li Wang contests the county's $272,300 value on 1002 Willow Drive, Unit 4, arguing for a reduction on comparable properties. The county's own opinion was $259,900.Reduced to $259,900
-
Carl D. Atkins, trustee contests the county's $131,600 value on 6526 NC 49, arguing for a reduction on a perceived excessive increase and condition. The county's own opinion was $111,600.Reduced to $111,600Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Qing Cheng contests the county's $272,300 value on 1002 Willow Drive, Unit 81, arguing for a reduction on condition and comparable sales. The county's own opinion was $244,400.Reduced to $244,400Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Paul Smith contests the county's $761,600 value on 3160 Forest Knolls Road, arguing for a reduction on an easement, a creek and a riparian buffer. The county's own opinion was $761,600.No change, $761,600Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Altangla M. Johnson appeals removal from present-use value, the reduced tax treatment for working farm and forest land, saying she was unaware of the listing requirement.Late application accepted
-
The heirs of John D. Hughes appeal removal from present-use value on a 32.54-acre parcel on Atkins Road, decided on July 18, 2025.Late application accepted
-
Katherine Tumlinson contests the county's $804,000 value on 457 South Greensboro Street, arguing for a reduction on the county's valuation. The county's own opinion was $804,000.No change, $804,000Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Kevin Hooker contests the county's $862,600 value on 125 Ironwoods Drive, arguing for a reduction on the condition of the house. The county's own opinion was $800,700.Reduced to $774,200
-
Dolores H. Clark contests the county's $404,700 value on 109 Jones Ferry Road, arguing for a reduction on condition, the house being historic, and comparables. The county's own opinion was $385,100.Reduced to $355,300Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Lorie Clark contests the county's $408,500 value on 111 Jones Ferry Road, arguing for a reduction on the county's valuation. The county's own opinion was $389,000.No change, $389,000Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Elizabeth Harden contests the county's $432,000 value on 2218 Pathway Drive, arguing the property is compared against single-family homes rather than townhouses. The county's own opinion was $418,500.ContinuedOther Tax rate and revaluation
-
Leroy C. Hutto contests the county's $504,800 value on 25 South Circle Drive, arguing for a reduction on bedroom sizes, square footage and a deck. The county's own opinion was $436,000.Reduced to $436,000Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Kira McGovern contests the county's $420,800 value on 2224 Pathway Drive, arguing the property is compared against single-family homes rather than townhouses. The county's own opinion was $402,800.Continued
-
Alessandro Travaglia contests the county's $407,600 value on 2204 Pathway Drive, arguing the property is compared against single-family homes rather than townhouses. The county's own opinion was $392,000.Continued
-
Paul Mihas contests the county's $405,300 value on 2206 Pathway Drive, arguing the property is compared against single-family homes rather than townhouses. The county's own opinion was $389,700.Continued
-
Samuel Schilis contests the county's $813,900 value on 100 Dairy Court, arguing for a reduction on the values of comparable properties. The county's own opinion was $813,900.Reduced to $783,300Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Sandra P. Bell contests the county's $883,400 value on 111 Dillard Street, arguing for a reduction on a perceived excessive increase in valuation. The county's own opinion was $883,400.No change, $883,400Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Sandra P. Bell contests the county's $883,400 value on 109 Dillard Street, arguing for a reduction on a perceived errant valuation. The county's own opinion was $883,400.No change, $883,400Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Sandra P. Bell contests the county's $845,300 value on 109-A Dillard Street, arguing for a reduction on a perceived errant valuation. The county's own opinion was $845,300.No change, $845,300Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Xiajuan Yin contests the county's $943,500 value on 315 Palafox Drive, arguing for a reduction on the condition of the house. The county's own opinion was $921,800.Reduced to $856,000Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Chunyang Fan contests the county's $637,200 value on 110 Camille Court, arguing for a reduction on comparable properties. The county's own opinion was $637,200.Reduced to $612,000Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Hiram Chicurel Bayard contests the county's $740,300 value on 116 Hampshire Place, arguing for a reduction on a comparable sale. The county's own opinion was $740,300.Reduced to $699,000Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Norbert M. Lechner contests the county's $327,300 value on 311 Oakland Lane on land valuation grounds. The county did not change its opinion.Continued
-
Appeal of the $288,600 assessed value, based on the poor condition of a private access road and septic limitations on the 10.32-acre lot. The appellant requested $150,000.Reduced to $202,400Other Tax rate and revaluation
-
Appeal of the $442,200 assessed value, based on the property's recent purchase price and comparable sales. The appellant requested $390,000, citing repairs identified in a home inspection.Reduced to $399,100Other Tax rate and revaluation
Download these items as CSV Where else this comes up
Follow this
These links carry the filters above. Put one in a feed reader or a calendar and it keeps answering the same question as new meetings are collected — no account, and nothing about you is stored.